I mostly did book and film reviews and I'm still proud of a couple of them. Let's take a look:
Pictures at a Revolution - How the New Hollywood Got Its Start
The
1970s is generally considered to be one golden eras of American filmmaking.
During this decade a new generation of filmmakers, who would later be dubbed
“The New Hollywood,” created hundreds of films that confronted the changing
nature of America with brutal honesty and a love of cinema. However, filmmaking
revolutions do not happen in a day, and author Mark Harris believes the late
1960s was the breeding ground for this filmic schism. "Pictures at a Revolution:
Five Movies and the Birth of the New Hollywood" uses the five Best Picture Academy
Award nominees from 1967 to paint a picture of the Hollywood studio system in its
decline and to show us how it gave birth to the New Hollywood.
Opening Night
Pictures
at a Revolution tells the stories of 1967’s five Best Picture nominees: "Bonnie
and Clyde," "The Graduate," "In the Heat of the Night," "Guess Who’s Coming To Dinner,"
and "Dr. Doolittle." Harris tells the story each of film in a narrative fashion,
beginning in 1963 with a look at the state of Hollywood at the time. As the decade
wears on, the book intertwines between each film, documenting the films’ many
production and personnel struggles. Harris ends the book at the 1967 Academy
Awards held on April 10th, 1968 and briefly mentions the future for
many the films’ participants.
Mark
Harris’s greatest strength is his skill as a historian, as the amount of information
in this book is truly staggering. The author has interviewed many of the key
figures from the five films and uncovered an endless amount of archival
interviews and news articles. Simply publishing a book of facts with no attempt
to create a narrative would still make "Pictures at a Revolution" a must own; the
information contained in the book is of incredible value to any film buff.
Thankfully
Harris is no slouch at analysis as the book is fascinating portrait of the
Hollywood studio system at the end of the 1960s. He convincing argues that the
five films discussed are indicative of both the Old Hollywood studio system and
the emerging New Hollywood style. "Dr. Doolittle" and "Guess Who’s Coming to
Dinner" are representative of old-fashioned filmmaking techniques and dated
cultural attitudes, according to Harris, while "Bonnie and Clyde," "The Graduate,"
and, to a lesser extent, "Into the Heat of the Night", embody the counter-cultural
attitudes of a new generation of filmmakers. Harris sees the 1967 Oscars as the
ultimate clash between the establishment and the rebels, and, not surprisingly,
the least extreme of the New Hollywood’s films, "In the Heat of the Night," was
the ultimate Best Picture winner.
Part
of Harris’s strength is his ability to sympathize with and understand
filmmakers he ultimately disagrees with. For example, Harris is no fan of "Guess
Who’s Coming to Dinner" but he sees it as a legitimately important film and thoroughly
analyzes the attitudes of the film’s producer and director, Stanley Kramer. Much
time is spent discussing Kramer and his philosophies; a man who saw himself as a
political progressive but was hobbled by his compromising instincts, resulting in
a director and producer who tackled difficult subjects matter but never wanted
to offend anyone. Not surprisingly, he had trouble appealing to the
counter-culture, and the book’s anecdotes of Kramer holding college campus
screenings of "Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner" are heartbreaking. Kramer so wants
to fit in, but he can’t. He’s part of the Old Hollywood.
Closing Credits
If
there’s one complaint to be had with "Pictures at a Revolution" it is that Harris
skimps a bit at the end, and only provides mini-biographies for the book’s main
participants that briefly discuss their careers post-1967. Unfortunately this
does not cover the influence of the five films, particularly "Bonnie and Clyde"
and "The Graduate," very well. Much time is spent near the end of the book
examining the two films’ incredible impact on audiences and Harris does an
excellent job explaining how exciting and fresh the films were at the time.
However, a discussion of the two film’s impact on other films and the New
Hollywood of the 1970s in general would hammer Harris’s point home that they
helped birth a filmmaking revolution.
That
concern aside, "Pictures at a Revolution" is still an essential book, not only
for film enthusiasts, but for anyone interested the changing landscape of film.
Harris convincingly argues for the importance of the five films and how some
reflected the attitudes of old-fashioned Hollywood values and others protested
for counter-cultural change. By the book’s end the reader will have a deeper
appreciation for not only the 1970s New Hollywood, but this time period as
well. Hollywood was undergoing a massive number of growing pains, but it
matured into something wonderful. Maybe it will happen again.
